United Nations climate talks adopted a deal to inject at least $300 billion annually in humanity's fight against climate change, aimed at helping developing nations cope with the ravages of global warming in tense negotiations.

The $300 billion will go to developing countries who need the cash to wean themselves off the coal, oil and gas that causes the globe to overheat, adapt to future warming and pay for the damage caused by climate change's extreme weather. It's not near the full amount of $1.3 trillion that developing countries were asking for, but it's three times a deal of $100 billion a year from 2009 that is expiring. Some delegations said this deal is headed in the right direction, with hopes that more money flows in the future.

But it was not quite the agreement by consensus that these meetings usually operate with and some developing nations were livid about being ignored.

COP29 President Mukhtar Babayev gaveled the deal into acceptance before any nation had a chance to speak. When they did they blasted him for being unfair to them, the deal for not being enough and the world's rich nations for being too stingy.

However, Chandni Raina, a representative for India's COP 29 delegation, slammed the deal.

"We are disappointed in the outcome which clearly brings out the unwillingness of the developed country parties to fulfil their responsibilities," said Raina, according to Reuters.

She called it "nothing more than an optical illusion," saying it "will not address the enormity of the challenge we all face. Therefore, we oppose the adoption of this document."

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres also indicated in a social media post disappointment in the outcome, saying that he "had hoped for a more ambitious outcome, on both finance and mitigation, to meet the great challenge we face."

He said the agreement is a "base on which to build. It must be honored in full and on time. Commitments must quickly become cash."

In a statement, President Biden called the deal a "historic outcome," saying it "will help mobilize the level of finance – from all sources – that developing countries need to accelerate the transition to clean, sustainable economies, while opening up new markets for American-made electric vehicles, batteries, and other products."

He added that "in the years ahead, we are confident that the United States will continue this work...While some may seek to deny or delay the clean energy revolution that's underway in America and around the world, nobody can reverse it — nobody."

President-elect Donald Trump has said he will, for a second time, exit the Paris Agreement, which was signed in in 2016 and seeks to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. The world is already at 1.3 degrees Celsius and carbon emissions keep rising. The U.S. formally withdrew during Trump's first term, but then rejoined under Mr. Biden.

Meanwhile, a long line of nations agreed with India and piled on, with Nigeria's Nkiruka Maduekwe, CEO of the National Council on Climate Change, calling the deal an insult and a joke.

"I'm disappointed. It's definitely below the benchmark that we have been fighting for for so long," said Juan Carlos Monterrey, of the Panama delegation. He noted that a few changes, including the inclusion of the words "at least" before the number $300 billion and an opportunity for revision by 2030, helped push them to the finish line.

"Our heart goes out to all those nations that feel like they were walked over," he said.

The final package pushed through "does not speak or reflect or inspire confidence," India's Raina said.

"We absolutely object to the unfair means followed for adoption," Raina said. "We are extremely hurt by this action by the president and the secretariat."

Speaking for nearly 50 of the poorest nations of the world, Evans Davie Njewa of Malawi was more mild, expressing what he called reservations with the deal. And the Alliance of Small Island States' Cedric Schuster said he had more hope "that the process would protect the interests of the most vulnerable" but nevertheless expressed tempered support for the deal.

There were somewhat satisfied parties, with European Union's Wopke Hoekstra calling it a new era of climate funding, working hard to help the most vulnerable. But activists in the plenary hall could be heard coughing over Hoekstra's speech in an attempt to disrupt it.

Eamon Ryan, Ireland's environment minister, called the agreement "a huge relief."

"It was not certain. This was tough," he said. "Because it's a time of division, of war, of (a) multilateral system having real difficulties, the fact that we could get it through in these difficult circumstances is really important."

U.N. Climate Change's Executive Secretary Simon Stiell called the deal an "insurance policy for humanity," adding that like insurance, "it only works if the premiums are paid in full, and on time."

The deal is seen as a step toward helping countries on the receiving end create more ambitious targets to limit or cut emissions of heat-trapping gases that are due early next year. It's part of the plan to keep cutting pollution with new targets every five years, which the world agreed to at the U.N. talks in Paris in 2015.

Countries also anticipate that this deal will send signals that help drive funding from other sources, like multilateral development banks and private sources. That was always part of the discussion at these talks — rich countries didn't think it was realistic to only rely on public funding sources — but poor countries worried that if the money came in loans instead of grants, it would send them sliding further backward into debt that they already struggle with.

"The $300 billion goal is not enough, but is an important down payment toward a safer, more equitable future," said World Resources Institute President Ani Dasgupta. "This deal gets us off the starting block. Now the race is on to raise much more climate finance from a range of public and private sources, putting the whole financial system to work behind developing countries' transitions."

And even though it's far from the needed $1.3 trillion, it's more than the $250 billion that was on the table in an earlier draft of the text, which outraged many countries and led to a period of frustration and stalling over the final hours of the summit.


Conference participants attend the second part of the closing plenary on day 12 at the COP29 Climate Conference on Nov. 24, 2024, in Baku, Azerbaijan. The COP29, which was scheduled to end Saturday, went into overtime, with parties meeting and deliberating over the text of the final agreement following heavy criticism by a wide array of delegates of earlier drafts. SeanGallup / Getty Images

Source